Brainstorming sessions are supposed to spark creativity, generate diverse ideas, and encourage innovative problem-solving. But more often than not, they lead to groupthink—a phenomenon where individuals conform to the dominant ideas of the group rather than contributing unique or dissenting perspectives. The result is a lack of creativity, reduced critical thinking, and a pool of ideas that’s far less diverse than it could have been.
To understand why this happens, we need to look beyond the mechanics of brainstorming itself and delve into how our evolutionary instincts—shaped in small, tightly-knit communities—clash with the demands of modern collaboration. The answer lies in evolutionary mismatch, where behaviors and instincts that were once advantageous in ancient environments now hinder us in modern contexts.
In ancestral societies, being part of a group was essential for survival. Exclusion from the group could mean loss of access to resources, protection, and social support. As a result, humans evolved a strong need to conform to group norms and avoid actions or opinions that might lead to rejection.
Mismatch Today: In a brainstorming session, this fear of rejection manifests as a reluctance to share unconventional or dissenting ideas. Even when participants are encouraged to think outside the box, the subconscious need for social acceptance can lead them to align with the group’s dominant ideas rather than risk standing out.
Our ancestors lived in small, hierarchical groups where deference to authority figures or dominant individuals was a survival strategy. Challenging a leader’s opinion or the consensus of the group could have social or even physical consequences.
Mismatch Today: Modern brainstorming sessions often include participants of varying status—managers, team leaders, and junior employees. Even in “flat” organizations, power dynamics can influence behavior. Individuals may suppress their ideas to avoid contradicting higher-ups or dominant personalities in the room, leading to groupthink.
Humans evolved to value social harmony and cooperation within their group. Conflict or prolonged disagreement could jeopardize the group’s cohesion, putting survival at risk. As a result, humans are wired to prioritize agreement over contention.
Mismatch Today: In brainstorming sessions, this instinct for harmony drives participants to seek consensus rather than debate. While agreement feels comfortable, it stifles the critical analysis and creative friction needed for true innovation.
From an evolutionary standpoint, early signals in uncertain situations were often critical for survival. If a member of a group identified a threat or a solution, others were likely to follow their lead to avoid hesitation or risk.
Mismatch Today: In brainstorming sessions, the first idea shared often becomes an “anchor” that shapes the direction of the discussion. Subsequent ideas tend to build on or align with this initial suggestion, limiting diversity of thought.
Our ancestors lived in groups of around 30–50 people, where collaboration involved small, tight-knit teams with strong interpersonal bonds. Communication was direct, and everyone’s voice could be heard.
Mismatch Today: Modern brainstorming sessions often involve larger, more diverse groups where not everyone gets an equal opportunity to contribute. This dynamic leads to “social loafing,” where some participants let others take the lead.
In fast-paced environments, there’s often pressure to come up with solutions quickly. In evolutionary terms, this pressure aligns with the need to make rapid decisions in response to threats or opportunities. Quick consensus was advantageous when survival depended on immediate action.
Mismatch Today: Modern workplaces often prioritize efficiency over exploration. In brainstorming sessions, this translates into a rush to find a “good enough” idea rather than exploring diverse possibilities.
Brainstorming sessions often result in groupthink because they clash with the instincts we evolved to navigate small, close-knit groups focused on survival. Fear of exclusion, deference to authority, and a desire for harmony all contribute to conformity.
By understanding the evolutionary roots of groupthink and redesigning brainstorming processes to account for these mismatches, organizations can foster environments where creativity thrives and diverse ideas emerge. True innovation doesn’t come from comfortable consensus—it comes from embracing the messy, challenging process of genuine collaboration.
Subscribe to Mind the Gap! – my weekly newsletter.